Sovereign AI ready for United States.
ReguNav ships HIPAA, CCPA, SOC 2, NIST AI RMF, NIST CSF, PCI DSS — every control anchored to a US regulator. Whether you're a HIPAA-covered entity, a CCPA-supervised SaaS, or an FDA-regulated SaMD vendor, the regulator anchors are first-class on the platform.
United States regulator landscape
Every United States control on the platform is anchored to a named regulator artefact. When the regulator updates their guidance, the framework registry takes the bump and every dependent control inherits it.
Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ONC)
HTI-1 AI transparency · USCDI · TEFCAofficial ↗Frameworks anchored in United States
HIPAA Security & Privacy
2013 Omnibus20 clauses · 15 controlsUS federal regulation governing the use and disclosure of Protected Health Information (PHI) by Covered Entities (health plans, health-care clearinghouses, providers transmitting health information electronically) and Business Associates. Privacy Rule (§§ 164.500-534) governs uses and disclosures of PHI; Security Rule (§§ 164.302-318) requires administrative, physical and technical safeguards for ePHI; Breach Notification Rule (§§ 164.400-414) requires notice to affected individuals, the HHS Secretary and (for breaches affecting ≥500 individuals) prominent media outlets.
CCPA / CPRA
202417 clauses · 13 controlsCalifornia state privacy law applying to for-profit businesses doing business in California that (a) had annual gross revenues over $25 million in the preceding year, (b) annually buy/sell/share the personal information of 100,000+ California consumers or households, or (c) derive 50%+ of annual revenue from selling/sharing California consumers' personal information. Establishes seven consumer rights, three opt-out mechanisms (sale, sharing, sensitive PI), a notice + transparency regime, business-purpose service-provider + contractor + third-party distinctions, and a private right of action for certain data breaches. Enforced by the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) + the California Attorney General.
SOC 2 Type II
2017 TSC13 clauses · 15 controlsAICPA attestation framework for service organisations. The Common Criteria (CC1-CC9) form the security baseline that every SOC 2 engagement covers; the four additional categories (Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, Privacy) are optional and elected by the service organisation. A SOC 2 Type II engagement covers a period (typically 6-12 months) and attests to operating effectiveness of controls. Independent CPA service auditor produces the report under SSAE 18 / AT-C Section 320.
SOC 1 Type II
SSAE 18 AT-C 320 (2017)13 clauses · 14 controlsAICPA Service Organization Controls 1 (SOC 1) Type II examination — reports on the design and operating effectiveness of a service organization's controls likely to be relevant to user entities' Internal Control over Financial Reporting (ICFR). The examination is conducted by an independent service auditor under SSAE 18 AT-C 320. Type II covers a specified period (commonly 6 or 12 months) and includes the service auditor's tests of operating effectiveness. The framework captured here is the standard set of control-objective domains across the industry — logical access; change management; computer operations; system development; data transmission; physical security; data processing integrity — plus the structural requirements for the management description of the system (DC 1-8), the management assertion, CUECs (complementary user-entity controls), CSOCs (complementary subservice-organization controls), and carve-out vs inclusive-method subservice handling.
NIST AI Risk Management Framework
1.020 clauses · 14 controlsVoluntary US framework for managing risks posed by AI systems. Organises trustworthy-AI work into four core functions — GOVERN (organisational culture, policies, accountability), MAP (context, AI capabilities + use, impact identification), MEASURE (analysis, testing, tracking), MANAGE (prioritised risk response across the lifecycle). Each function decomposes into categories with subcategories. Outcomes — validity + reliability, safety, security + resilience, accountability + transparency, explainability + interpretability, privacy enhancement, fairness with managed bias — characterise trustworthy AI.
NIST CSF 2.0
2.022 clauses · 15 controlsVoluntary US framework organising cybersecurity activities into six functions — GOVERN, IDENTIFY, PROTECT, DETECT, RESPOND, RECOVER. Each function decomposes into categories with outcome-statement subcategories. Implementation Tiers (Partial, Risk-Informed, Repeatable, Adaptive) and Profiles (Current + Target) provide an organisational-maturity overlay. Suitable for use across critical infrastructure, government and the private sector at any size.
FedRAMP
Rev. 5 — 2024-0528 clauses · 18 controlsFederal Risk and Authorization Management Program — the US government programme that standardises security authorisation of cloud products and services for federal agencies. Built on the NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 control baseline; ReguNav indexes its three baselines (Low / Moderate / High), the 17 NIST 800-53 control families, and the FedRAMP-specific authorisation and continuous-monitoring (ConMon) obligations.
United States SaaS, fintech, healthcare-AI, or essential-service?
We work with organisations supervised by every regulator listed above. The jurisdiction-aware engine routes incident reports, DSARs, and FRIA submissions to the correct authority + timeline automatically.
Talk to United States team →Jurisdiction codes + regulator data are sourced from @regunav/jurisdictions (Apache-2.0, open-source). Adding a new market is a single registry entry — no copy-paste regulator content. See /uk for the bespoke deep-dive template.